Re: distinctive properties of ecash, netbill, cybercash and iKP

[abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <Pine.GSO.3.93.960511163200.17967B-100000@happyman>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@stallion.ee> wrote:
> 
>  Sat, 11 May 1996, Jon Moore wrote:

> > The banks/cash-issuing corporations are likely to support anything
> > that is secure enough, and looks like a runner, because any e-money
> > scheme is profitable to them (they earn interest on the
> > corresponding real cash while the e-money is in circulation). 
> 
> This is one question why the central bank in Estonia (I am not sure about
> other countries) does not allow issuing e-cash here in Estonia. While the
> banks issue e-cash to people, they get some real cash from people.  This
> leads to actually doubleing the money in circulation, each monetary unit,
> either dollar or kroon, can at the same time be used by owner of e-cash
> and at the same time by the bank. The central banks are afraid that when
> the amount of e-cash in circulation gets big, this could lead to
> devalvation of money, especially a small country like Estonia is afraid of
> such development.

Good heavens!  Are checking accounts illegal in Estonia, then?  The exact
same argument applies to them.

> 
> Anonymity of monetary transactions is another thing that Bank of Estonia
> has declared illegal.

Cash is illegal, too!  How does the economy in Estonia work these days?
Barter?

- -- 
Alan Bostick               | "The thing is, I've got rhythm but I don't have
mailto:abostick@netcom.com | music, so I guess I could ask for a few more 
news:alt.grelb             | things." (overheard)
http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~abostick

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQB1AwUBMZTKJ+VevBgtmhnpAQHHpQMAmpLtHIXNIHSxBnAtZMz2mlVoI7i+765r
i9Cv6J0TA3OWd1LqFnrOSlpL9SIjAAxn0bwSZFERwfzetyIxya5ctyWRUOjbQtI3
ApL5XhskucNEq9Z5cWl0wQRwptivCCLl
=rvLb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----