Re: crosspost re remailers

[Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>]

On Tue, 14 May 1996, Keith Henson wrote:

> was to Krup.   I can't speak for all of them--actually, I can't speak
> for *any* of them, but the ones who have said anything about the
> recent uses of the remailers do not seem unhappy.  There may be
> some discussion related to this on the cypherpunks mailing list.

Actually, there hasn't really been any discussion on cypherpunks, which I
find a little surprising. I'd have thought that a remailer going down
because of political/legal pressure would raise more of a ruckus. People
seem jaded, but I'm not sure why.

I posted a half dozen articles to comp.org.eff.talk, more to stimulate
discussion than to argue a position. We trolled up a statement from Hal
Finney to the effect that remailers might need to be restricted in order
to save them -- which I found to be rather provocative, but nobody said
anything. Anybody?

-rich