Re: The Crisis with Remailers

[Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>]

> A much richer ecology of remailers is sorely needed. A factor of at least
> 10 or 20 more (100-300 remailer sites), less reliance on specific sites, an
> "everyone a remailer" capability (which has many elegant advantages!), more
> traffic, temporarily instantiated sites, digital postage, greater ease of
> use (especially with crypto and chaining), and such things as nominal
> terminal remailers choosing to add their own hops (so as to lessen their
> own target potential). Having some of these improvements will be a big
> help.

I think it would help tremendously if elm or pine were hacked to allow for
remailing.  Even better would be some sort of dynamic remailer addressing
- sendmail certainly doesn't allow for this capability. :( I think we need
something similar to dynamic routing for remailers. 
--
Ed Carp, N7EKG    			Ed.Carp@linux.org, ecarp@netcom.com
					214/993-3935 voicemail/digital pager
Finger ecarp@netcom.com for PGP 2.5 public key		an88744@anon.penet.fi

"Past the wounds of childhood, past the fallen dreams and the broken families,
through the hurt and the loss and the agony only the night ever hears, is a
waiting soul.  Patient, permanent, abundant, it opens its infinite heart and
asks only one thing of you ... 'Remember who it is you really are.'"

                    -- "Losing Your Mind", Karen Alexander and Rick Boyes

The mark of a good conspiracy theory is its untestability.
		    -- Andrew Spring