Re: Instant Remailers

["Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sun, 19 May 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

> I'm always surprised that this hasn't been happening; maybe it will when
> the new clients become available.
> 
> (Doesn't Sameer's system offer such accounts? Couldn't there be dozens of
> remailers based at c2.org? Of the 16 Type-1 remailers listed in one of
> Raph's recent reports, only 2 were at c2.org.)

I would be a little worried about many remailers being run at one site.  If
the ISP is ever shut down, then a lot of remailers will go down.  This would
be an ideal "choke point" for the feds.

> [...]
> 
> Ideally, such remailers should require no involvement at all by the account
> holder. Just a "start" command, by the account holder. (Not the site
> administrator, as this could be construed as involvement by him.)
> 
> But an "instant remailer" (just add water) is needed. Recent questions here
> on the list about what it takes to run a remailer may mean some advice is
> needed.
> 
> Running a remailer function should never be thought of as being the same as
> running a site. Most of the existing remailers are certainly not being run
> on machines _owned_ by those running the remailers.

Such a program would certainly be feasible.  I might try writing something
like it.

- -- Mark

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
markm@voicenet.com              | finger -l for PGP key 0xe3bf2169
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ | d61734f2800486ae6f79bfeb70f95348
((2b) || !(2b))                 | Old key now used only for signatures
"The concept of normalcy is just a conspiracy of the majority" -me


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMZ8x+rZc+sv5siulAQFNvwP/U6XRcE+/ad3CC3YSCigvwDIYlLjPyNsC
e9TnKrc56Z1KidIyGmHFS4siyZIjdritA+sEqPOID1OT6b9sQx1YPmOeMeCaWAHE
5AtMrZ+zzpY8bdQh8Vwk8j2T5vKsza+tkuEP3AxnJzCrIPfIQjWRp/f5oz6WE0tj
tXu2QPFEliE=
=W2kT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----