[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
encrypted open books
On Mon, 20 May 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> Look up cypernomicon, "open encrypted books"
There is indeed a short section in the Cyphernomicon about encrypted open
books. Unfortunately it doesn't describe it in detail, and since the
hks.net archive is down, I can't look up Eric Hughes' original e-mail on
the topic. If anyone has a copy of it in his personal archive, please
repost it. I'm sure other people would be interested as well.
Here is the section from Cyphernomicon:
12.16.1. Encrypted open books, or anonymous auditing
- Eric Hughes has worked on a scheme using a kind of blinding
to do "encrypted open books," whereby observers can verify
that a bank is balancing its books without more detailed
looks at individual accounts. (I have my doubts about
spoofs, attacks, etc., but such are always to be considered
in any new protocol.)
- "Kent Hastings wondered how an offshore bank could provide
assurances to depositors. I wondered the same thing a few
months ago, and started working on what Perry calls the
anonymous auditing problem. I have what I consider to be
the core of a solution.
...The following is long.... [TCM Note: Too long to include
here. I am including just enough to convince readers that
some new sorts of banking ideas may come out of
cryptography.]
"If we use the contents of the encrypted books at the
organizational boundary points to create suitable legal
opbligations, we can mostly ignore what goes on inside of
the mess of random numbers. That is, even if double books
were being kept, the legal obligations created should
suffice to ensure that everything can be unwound if needed.
This doesn't prevent networks of corrupt businesses from
going down all at once, but it does allow networks of
honest businesses to operate with more assurance of
honesty." [Eric Hughes, PROTOCOL: Encrypted Open Books,
1993-08-16]
Wei Dai