[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Crisis with Remailers

To: [email protected] (Lance Cottrell)
Subject: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
From: Adam Shostack <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 12:36:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <adc6fd44040210044e8a@[206.170.115.3]> from "Lance Cottrell" at May 20, 96 10:25:23 pm
Sender: [email protected]

Lance Cottrell wrote:
| 
| An interesting problem with anonymous postage is that it is likely to kill
| cover traffic generators.
| 

Postage is most needed at the point of delivery.

That is the node that will be taking the heat/paying the lawyers.  I'd
operate a remailer if I was never the last node, becuase I don't have
a site that can take the heat/seizure of machines for me.  If we pay
those final nodes to do more, than intermediate nodes can still carry
cover traffic for free.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume

References:
- Re: The Crisis with Remailers
  - From: [email protected] (Lance Cottrell)

Prev by Date: Re: CAPITALISTS' SUCK
Next by Date: Re: An alternative to remailer shutdowns
Prev by thread: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
Next by thread: Re: The Crisis with Remailers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread