Re: Long-Lived Remailers

[tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)]

At 11:31 PM 5/21/96, David E. Smith wrote:

>Unless Alice will automatically rotate between some random set
>of Bob1, Bob2, Bob3... It also wouldn't be too difficult
>to set up a message that goes through several points before
>emerging at a randomly-chosen exitpoint, including a
>completely independent remailer.

Sure, Alice can always herself add remailer steps. I explicitly mentioned
this in my  message last night, when I wrote: "(Hal, to use him as the
example, could start using his own choice of remailer hops to accomplish
much the same result. We've talked about this for a long time, too...."

But this is just using more remailers. We know this works. What Mark Grant
was suggesting was something different, a kind of "disposable final
emanation point," designed to go away easily under legal pressures.

--Tim May

Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May              | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net  408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA  | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist         | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."