[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remailers, Copyright, and Scientology
On Tue, 21 May 1996, jim bell wrote:
> At 07:36 PM 5/21/96 -0500, Allen Ethridge wrote:
> >Yes, the cult does have a legitimate interest in protecting their
> >copyrights.
>
> I'm wondering whether they properly handled the copyright status of some of
> those (silly) texts. While it is somewhat nice of you (in regards to them)
> to say what you did, it is possible that they lost their copyrights decades
> ago by printing them (even internally) without the (then) appropriate
> "circle-C" copyright notice. Chances are good that none of this material
> could survive a genuine copyright test case today.
Incorrect.
Please learn the "latter in time" rule and revisit the above question.
>
>
>
> Jim Bell
> [email protected]
>
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:[email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: [email protected]