[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Chaum's System Traceable or Untraceable?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <[email protected]>,
E. ALLEN SMITH <[email protected]> wrote:
>From: IN%"[email protected]" 23-MAY-1996 13:56:31.71
>
>>Ah. I see I was misunderstood. The goal was not to make the shop anonym=
ous,
>>but rather to be able to provide change to an anonymous payer.
>
> I had thought that the basic purpose of the fully anon system was just
>that - full anonymnity for payer and payee. Under your suggestion, the shop
>gives up this anonymnity under these circumstances in order to be able to =
make
>change. I'm not sure if I would call that a very good tradeoff...
> -Allen
Yes, that's the _basic_ purpose, but the "anon" protocol has several
useful "secondary" properties as well. This (providing change to an
anonymous payer) is one of them.
- Ian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMatj1kZRiTErSPb1AQH0PQP/U6SvqgUew4oDQjo5U4mRJurDm0Co+3va
YCQ6TvqfkkvQDMu3HtFqolBKa6CAhJXz3RFq1mEV50F/VvafD45Utui6btH4JSCh
1xljSeGO6aF7cFW5NhSe/r8oW1IkwQbb6vkJRZQlt2fYr1qTjYp2+PmJsHXbIqk+
z1aV/VYiJdI=
=r7eJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----