[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)

To: [email protected] (Mutatis Mutantdis)
Subject: Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)
From: Derek Atkins <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 19:10:11 EDT
cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 May 1996 19:37:09 GMT." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> It seems quite doable to add support for SHA-1 signatures (and possibly key
> generation for encrypting secret keys?).
> 
> Adding 3DES (and maybe Luby-Rackoff-SHA, assuming it hasn't been cracked
> recently at the Fast Software Conf.... more info?!?) would be nifty too...
> unless, of course, there's meaning to the Real Soon Now that PGP3 folx
> claim.

Both of these algorithms are currently in the PGPlib sources.

-derek

References:
- Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)
  - From: [email protected] (Mutatis Mutantdis)

Prev by Date: Re: [crypto] crypto-protocols for trading card games
Next by Date: Re: Internet traffic is monitored.
Prev by thread: Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)
Next by thread: Re: Ok, what about PGP (was: MD5 collisions)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread