[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
From: Bruce Baugh <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 11:27:33 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

At 04:33 AM 6/3/96 +0000, Deranged Mutant wrote:

>In part because it's not well integrated with mailers.  That could 
>change with a PGP3 DLL.

I have a growing feeling that PGP 3 is never going to happen. Or that if it
does, it will happen only after the passage of more draconian anti-privacy
laws, and the guys working on it will be forced to include sundry backdoor
stuff or drop it altogether.

I suspect someone could do quite nicely by going ahead and developing a
2.6.2 or 2.6.3 DLL.

--
Bruce Baugh
[email protected]
http://www.aracnet.com/~bruce

Prev by Date: Re: Java Crypto API questions
Next by Date: Re: Fate of Ecash if RSA is cracked?
Prev by thread: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
Next by thread: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread