FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

[Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       SANDY SANDFORT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

C'punks,

In a recent exchange, Carl Ellison wrote:

>After the meeting ended it hit me what the problem is and I 
>mentioned it to PRZ.  We're complaining that the Executive 
>has gone rogue -- is disobeying the will of the people.  
>PRZ likened it to Nixon's war in Cambodia.

To which Jim Bell replied:

>I have a solution to that problem.

My question for member of this list is:  When Bell finally
goes too far and they arrest or shoot him, how can we best
capitalize on his martyrdom?  Or in a more negative light,
what damage control will we need to do in that case?

Now I know that barking dogs rarely bite, but Jim may just
fool us and find his cajones.  In any event, the sort of 
yapping he is doing could itself be considered a crime that 
could attract the sort of negative attention he apparently 
craves.

Any suggestions?


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~