[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
From: TT <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 16:41:01 +1000 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Tue, 4 Jun 1996, TT wrote:
 
> I think it is actually easy to use, although granted others may not; but 
> that people tend not to use it as a matter of course (and it is my belief 
> this is a desireable thing) due too the time taken to manually sign mail 
> or sign and encrypt.

Correction: should read...it is my belief this is _not_ a desireable thing..

-- 
   .////.   .//    Charles Senescall            [email protected]
 o:::::::::///                                         [email protected]
>::::::::::\\\     Finger me for PGP PUBKEY           Brisbane AUSTRALIA
   '\\\\\'   \\    http://quux.apana.org.au/~apache/

References:
- Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
  - From: TT <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: CWD: "Jacking in from the "One that Got Away" Port
Next by Date: Greetings from Star+Globe
Prev by thread: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
Next by thread: Re: Why PGP isn't so ubiquitous (was NRC Session Hiss)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread