Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

[tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)]

At 7:30 PM 6/4/96, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

>To which Jim Bell replied:
>
>>I have a solution to that problem.
>
>My question for member of this list is:  When Bell finally
>goes too far and they arrest or shoot him, how can we best
>capitalize on his martyrdom?  Or in a more negative light,
>what damage control will we need to do in that case?
>
>Now I know that barking dogs rarely bite, but Jim may just
>fool us and find his cajones.  In any event, the sort of
>yapping he is doing could itself be considered a crime that
>could attract the sort of negative attention he apparently
>craves.
>
>Any suggestions?

As we've all learned from our studies of quantum cryptography, the answer
lies in Bell's Theorem. As we know, Bell's Theorem says that if a Bell is
ever removed in one place, another Bell appears someplace else
instantaneously.

Glad to be of help.

--Klaus! von Future Prime