[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: On the Hill: Child Porn "Morphing"



Jeffrey A Nimmo wrote:
> ...
> It only has to give the impression of being under the age of consent in
> order to be illegal. No real models have to be involved.
> 
> > Silliness.  All silliness.
> 
> That's debatable.

Anything's debatable, but silliness it remains.  The entire (also
silly, but tediously common) "but there's a real victim involved"
argument goes out the window.  And where's the line drawn?  Like
take for example this filthy little number:

		o+<

Pretty wild, huh?  I mean, so young, and so willing!  Boy, I'm
gettin' all sweaty here just thinking about it; I'd better send
off this note quick and go take a cold shower.

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       [email protected] * [email protected]          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional