[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On the Hill: Child Porn "Morphing"
Jeffrey A Nimmo wrote:
> ...
> It only has to give the impression of being under the age of consent in
> order to be illegal. No real models have to be involved.
>
> > Silliness. All silliness.
>
> That's debatable.
Anything's debatable, but silliness it remains. The entire (also
silly, but tediously common) "but there's a real victim involved"
argument goes out the window. And where's the line drawn? Like
take for example this filthy little number:
o+<
Pretty wild, huh? I mean, so young, and so willing! Boy, I'm
gettin' all sweaty here just thinking about it; I'd better send
off this note quick and go take a cold shower.
______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * pain is inevitable
[email protected] * [email protected] *
<URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> * suffering is optional