[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

To: [email protected], jim bell <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 08:29:56 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 6-Jun-96 Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
by jim [email protected] 
> Not quite yet, anyway.  I'm very disappointed to have waited over a year for 
> some slick lawyer to show me how I'd be violating some law or another
to do so
> .

A few observations:

1. Not many readers of cypherpunks are lawyers
2. Of the laywers who do read cypherpunks, many may not choose to spend
their time researching what laws AP may violate. Or they're not "slick"
lawyers; take your pick.
3. Congress would have no problems passing a law outlawing AP, if one
does not exist already.

-Declan

References:
- Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
  - From: jim bell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Micropayments: myth?
Next by Date: Banking's Physical Security
Prev by thread: Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
Next by thread: Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread