[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anonymous remailers mentioned in CDA decision
On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Michael Froomkin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
>
> > I think they would be unwise to appeal, but I can also see where the
> > political considerations would override that basic logic.
> >
>
> The unstated assumption, of course, is that the Justice Dept was really
> trying to win... One wondered, at times...
Excellent point, though I think this would have been a personal decision
on the part of the parties involved rather than a institutional one.
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:[email protected]
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: [email protected]