[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Remailer Operator Liability?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 10.18 AM 6/15/96 -0400, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
>Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 15-Jun-96 Re: Remailer Operator
>Liabi.. by [email protected]
>> distributed to a minor who was using a nym. I think pressure on anonymous
>> remailers is going to increase as various groups complain that the paw
>> innocent widdle kiddies are "vulnerable to corruption"(or some bullshit like
>> that) because their age can be hidden. Read the decision. The CDA _may_ be
>
>This is true. Yesterday evening I interviewed the director of
>enforcement for a TLA here in DC. He expressed his concern about
>anonymous remailers and anonymity online. (More on this later.)
>
>The word here in DC is "accountability."
>
>-Declan
Am I the only one who thinks that any kid who is competent enough and smart enough
to use a nym will not only 1) not be warped or corrupted by the horrible porno demons
but also 2) won't even care about porno?
===============================================================================
David Rosoff (nihongo o chiisaku dekimasu) -------------> [email protected]
For PGP key 0xD37692F9, finger [email protected] or get from keyservers
pub 1024/D37692F9 1995/07/01 David Rosoff <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = 25 7D AA 01 85 41 43 89 50 5A 33 76 F1 F1 99 67
I accept anonymous mail. If I didn't sign it, you don't know I wrote it.
===
"Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will / To strive, to seek, to find--
and not to yield." <---- "Ulysses", by Alfred, Lord Tennyson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMcMI4xguzHDTdpL5AQHSUQQAo0YJvapyiC5r2eoY5BDaEEf164zxE+ub
JUw807Ovtsg0SSoyESHOAyO4S8usq4dV8JVJRlmGitAo+p9BJPWe8UYX8u4LU9se
LZoCOkgwomRLdLL4D4/3ALaT/qanTpuJ/NelxGN7871+jSA6qiuL8nSLdTiU3zL8
YHaWo7z1nNI=
=m9F9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----