Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches

["Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>]

Tim writes:

> I don't see how "remote scanning" of the population at large, without
> probable cause, is much different from the cops listening in from a
> distance with parabolic antennas. Both cases involve detection of signals
> emitted from the target. And yet such long-distance interception is not
> allowed without a warrant.

I vaguely remember another possibly relevant precedent, where a
judge ruled that a warrant was required before a thermal imager
could be used to look at a house suspected by the police of
being a (pot) grow house.

Peter Trei
trei@process.com