[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hackers invade DOJ web site
At 5:17 AM 8/21/96, Alan Olsen wrote:
>One of the best comments I have seen (from another list) was:
>
>"These are the people who want us to escrow our encryption keys with them
>and yet they can't protect their own web site."
>
>I think this can be used as a very valid example as to why they are
>untrustworthy to be in charge of keeping anything private and/or protected,
>let alone private encryption keys.
Something for future hackers to think about adding in future attacks (*):
"Press HERE to access National Law Enforcement Master Key Database"
or
"Back Door" (with some semi-realistic-looking computer files....)
or
"Click HERE to download confidential FBI dossiers on Clinton's political
enemies."
(with a few entries on leading Republicans and former White House
occupants, for verisimilitude)
In other words, the DOJ attack _could have_ made some much stronger points
than merely saying DOJ is linked to Hitler and pornography, etc.
(* I am not by these words _encouraging_ such hacks, at least not in any
active, conspiratorial, RICO sense.)
--Tim May
Illegal speech if said to Herr Clinton: "You suck, and those boys died!"
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, I know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
[email protected] 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."