[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
From: Jim Gillogly <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 96 10:40:31 PDT
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Aug 96 14:55:49 +0200. <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Asgaard <[email protected]> writes:
>In the meantime, before these technological fixes are easily implemented,
>what is the proper way to handle unwanted commercial mail?

>What if the spam says: 'Do only reply to this if you want
>further contact with us' etc?

Then you fix up the "Reply-to:" line to point back to them, helping them
debug their anti-loop procedures.  For extra credit use port 25 to create
the mail so that they can't easily ignore "Reply-to" and use the "From:"
line for their next salvo.

	Jim Gillogly
	Trewesday, 29 Wedmath S.R. 1996, 17:39

References:
- Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
  - From: Asgaard <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level
Next by Date: Re: Spamming
Prev by thread: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Next by thread: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread