[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
From: Jim Gillogly <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 96 13:46:00 PDT
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 21 Aug 96 12:18:20 -0700. <Pine.3.89.9608211152.A29889-0100000@netcom>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

"Paul S. Penrod" <[email protected]> writes:
>Practically, it would be better to allow and promote a technological 
>outlet for all of this, as it will never go away, so long as the medium 
>exists.

The technological outlet already exists: polite marketers use Web pages,
so that people who are interested in their offerings can find them using
one of the search engines.  Market droids (get over it, dude) are
unwilling to reach only people who are interested in their products.

	Jim Gillogly
	Trewesday, 29 Wedmath S.R. 1996, 20:45

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
  - From: "Paul S. Penrod" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
  - From: "Paul S. Penrod" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: HP supporting GAK, export controls
Next by Date: No Subject
Prev by thread: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Next by thread: Re: Spamming (Good or Bad?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread