[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

To: Jon Lebkowsky <[email protected]>, Stanton McCandlish <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Bill Stewart)
Subject: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
From: "James A. Donald" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 1996 07:44:14 -0700
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

At 03:17 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
> Not necessarily. The character of the anonymous speech is decisive. If you
> use anonymity to cloak harassment, for instance, the anonymity (which
> removes accountability) is a problem.  The accountability issue is real and
> should be addressed, not evaded.

No:  The harassment is the problem, not the anonymity that makes it
possible.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   [email protected]

Prev by Date: Save the Howitzers (was Re: The Esther Dyson Flap)
Next by Date: Re: The Esther Dyson Flap
Prev by thread: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
Next by thread: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread