[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks

To: [email protected] (Ross Wright)
Subject: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
From: Damaged Justice <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 23:16:54 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Ross Wright" at Sep 6, 96 04:57:51 pm
Organization: Somewhere just far enough outside of your jurisdiction
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]


This is utter horseshit. AOL, like any private individual or organization,
has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, or
even for no reason at all. The gubmint isn't doing SQUAT, except forcing
AOL to allow the spammers access.

--
http://yakko.cs.wmich.edu/~frogfarm ...for the best in unapproved information
      Hey, Bill Clinton: You suck, and those boys died! I hope you die!
 I feel a groove comin' on             $              Freedom...yeah, right.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
  - From: Florian Lengyel <[email protected]>
- Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
  - From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
  - From: "Ross Wright" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Metcalf and Other Net.Fogies
Next by Date: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
Prev by thread: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
Next by thread: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread