[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mailing lists



 On Or About: 12 Sep 96 at 18:11, Rabid Wombat wrote:
> 
> > more restricted. I'm personally against needing to pay the social costs of
> > more and more laws because someone is trying to make a buck any way he
> > can, regardless of the costs and annoyances to others.
> > 
> > Junk faxing was a blessedly short term fad, one that had to be legislated 
> > 
> > I'm completely in favor of allowing junk email, as long as "JUNK MAIL" is 
> > required to be the first thing on the subject line. PLONK!   ... but that 
> > will take yet another law ... 
> 
 Wombat:
 
 If you are "against needing to pay the social costs of more and more
 laws"  Then how come you want another one? 
 
> IE," as long as "JUNK MAIL" is required to be the first thing on
> the subject line. PLONK! >... but that will take yet another law
> > ... "!
 
 One more law to pay for, one foot in the door for the government. 
 Don't call for new legislation in order to not get spam!  Please.
 
 Ross


===========
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906