[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
From: Tom Weinstein <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 23:46:13 -0700
CC: Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>
Organization: Netscape Communications, Inc.
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

Hallam-Baker wrote:
> 
> There was a long list of security holes in SSL, PCT plugged a good
> number of them and SSL v3 plugged a few.

This statement surprises me.  It appears to mean that you think PCT has
fewer holes than SSL 3.0.  If you know of any holes in SSL 3.0, I'd be
very interested in hearing about them.

-- 
You should only break rules of style if you can    | Tom Weinstein
coherently explain what you gain by so doing.      | [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
  - From: [email protected]

References:
- Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
  - From: Hallam-Baker <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Fed appellate judge remarks re anonymity, free speech on the net
Next by Date: Re: "Unwanted Mail"
Prev by thread: Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
Next by thread: Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread