[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 56 kbps modems

To: [email protected] (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Re: 56 kbps modems
From: David Lesher <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 22:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "[email protected]" at Sep 17, 96 08:40:49 am
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

[email protected] sez:
> 
> That I realize that baud and bit/sec are not the same, but I feel you would
>  have a hard time getting a 56k modem to work on a line that does not 
> support 28.8k fully, let alone 33.6k. 

I'm trying to guess on the magic at work.
Note that the far end must be a PRI. I wonder if they do some
guessing as to the quantization points, then iterate.

Also note there's no mention of the hype-writer's old friend,
compression.
-- 
A host is a host from coast to [email protected]
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

References:
- Re: 56 kbps modems
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Assassination Politics, was Kiddie porn on the Internet
Next by Date: really undetectable crypto made somewhat practical
Prev by thread: Re: 56 kbps modems
Next by thread: Re: 56 kbps modems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread