[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Snake-Oil FAQ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:54:08 1996
> I think a blacklist of that sort is inherently bad. I would much rather
> have the public be able to RECOGNIZE SYMPTOMS of snake oil, rather than
> just be spoon fed a list of good products vs. bad products. Pardon the
> cliche, but if you give a man a fish ... etc, etc.
Not only that, but you're also looking at a potential lawsuit, unless such
a list were compiled and managed through the use of a nymserver. Since
there's no way, within reasonable limits, that a cryptogrpahic program can
be proven bad, then a lawsuit is inevitable. I could potentially see a
list of products which have "methods which have been proven ineffective in
securing data against determined attacks" such as DES, etc., but otherwise,
it's just begging for trouble.
- ---
Sean Sutherland | GCS/C d- s+:+ a--- C+++ V--- P L E- W++ N++ K- w
PGP Key ID: E43E6489 | o O-(++) M-- V PS+ PE++ Y++ PGP++(+) t--- 5+++
http://pobox.com/~seans | X++ Rb++ DI+ D+ G e- h! !r y
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMkCLo1ZoKRrkPmSJAQE9swf/VWCd3++mf2NUPPPd37bW0oHTcz/T2Ft/
PAN/3bf0/NgE/0XxOHZn3DY2a8J5BYUNtnmoqwc/fVo+UQ1sLL8OgYZb/5PMLKtC
A4u9IzhNcdg03M5r2n8DltDIsYewiA7NS3IP3/7s9PU/qpsXxS5aa9rSryoB5sLe
qPRW97uutrhQD6BREcvVxpmYllYLLXGX9uYxevK99dxpUrNfjKWm/XL3iE2RsF5n
6mERNQXu3yUEEfPpAvIUPXmw9raAhlseBVBY+S4CbhqKRmH8pn6X2ZKeWouo4cPn
ZWyyW6CrQJXbX8ARCp8ojI66UgkHCQpNWKIWKwAvTvtoPAT0lSvd+A==
=zuPa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----