[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]

To: jim bell <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 96 17:48:56 -0400
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Sep 96 18:03:21 -0800." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]


So Jim Bell is opposed to "truly random attacks on ordinary citizens"
Its this type ofappoligia for terrorism that disgusts me utterly.

He is calling for murder but wants to dress it up in whatever psychotic
justifications he can.

He is also completely wrong. When the IRA attemoted to assasinate my cousin
I was in no way intimidated and neither was he. He continued as a senior
poitician for over a decade despite continued danger. I can think of no
less effective method of bringing about change in attitudes.

I am in no way intimidated by Bell either. He is a kook and I don;t think it
he is worth further consideration.

	Phill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]
  - From: [email protected] (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

References:
- Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]
  - From: jim bell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: GA HB1630 Lawsuit: Press Advisory
Next by Date: Re: Go away CIA
Prev by thread: Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]
Next by thread: Re: AP [was: Re: Kiddie porn on the Internet] [NOISE]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread