[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexis and Privacy - Bill approaches.
Dear PhneCards,
Please stop using my email address as part of an inappropriate email
bomb. If this continues, I will be forced to persecute your return
email address.
Now we don't want that to happen, do we?
-Declan
On Wed, 25 Sep 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 18:13:24 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Lexis and Privacy - Bill approaches.
>
> Did you know this company is using your email address as part of
> an unlawful email bomb?
>
> I would advise you to write to them at [email protected]
> and [email protected] and advise them to stop
> using your email address for this type of activity.
>
> It is illegal to use a invalid return email address. If this continues, I
> will
> be forced to prosecute the return email address - which they are
> making to look like you.
>
> Below is the letter that I received in my email box
> =================================================
>
> In a message dated 96-09-25 15:12:13 EDT, you write:
>
> >Subj: Re: Lexis and Privacy - Bill approaches.
> >Date: 96-09-25 15:12:13 EDT
> >From: [email protected] (Declan McCullagh)
> >Sender: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected] (Black Unicorn)
> >CC: [email protected]
> >
> >This would be good if the bills were written well and thoughtfully.
> >Unfortunately, they explicitly extend executive branch regulatory
> >jurisdiction to the Net. At least the one I read did; I understand there
> >are multiple versions.
> >
> >-Declan
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Pressure from the FTC Which fielded hundreds of complaints about Lexis and
> >> the social security number scrap) has prompted members of the Banking
> >> Committee to add provisions to the most recent spending bills which
> >> protect personal information (including social security numbers, phone
> >> numbers, addresses, and so forth) under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
> >> This limits access to this information to credit agencies and otherwise
> >> authorized entities. (Of which I assume Lexis is not one).
> >>
> >> It's not great protection, but it's something.
> >>
> >> I urge everyone to take their own measures to protect personal data
> >> regardless of what some piece of paper on a library shelf says is
> >> protected. The only real protection is not to allow release of the data
> >> in the first place.
> >>
> >> --
> >> I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> >// [email protected] // I do not represent the EFF // [email protected] //
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
> >From [email protected] Wed Sep 25 15:11:39 1996
> >Return-Path: [email protected]
> >Received: from mailhub.MyMail.Com (mailhub.mymail.com [206.247.118.1]) by
> >emin14.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA10310 for
> ><[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 15:11:34 -0400
> >Received: from toad.com by mailhub.MyMail.Com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
> > id AA27335; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 13:11:11 -0600
> >Received: (from majordom@localhost) by toad.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA15636
> for
> >cypherpunks-outgoing; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 05:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: from eff.org ([email protected] [204.253.162.3]) by toad.com
> >(8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA15631 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 25 Sep
> >1996 05:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
> >Received: (from declan@localhost) by eff.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) id FAA10228; Wed,
> >25 Sep 1996 05:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
> >Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 05:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: Declan McCullagh <[email protected]>
> >To: Black Unicorn <[email protected]>
> >Cc: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: Lexis and Privacy - Bill approaches.
> >In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960924190706.9902A-100000@polaris>
> >Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> >Mime-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >Sender: [email protected]
> >Precedence: bulk
>
>
>