[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!

To: CP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
From: Derek Bell <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 19:25:22 +0100
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Sep 1996 06:47:12 PDT." <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

In message <[email protected]>, Rich Burrough
s writes:
>At 08:33 PM 9/23/96 -0700, [email protected] (Timothy C. May) wrote in response to PH-B:
>>I for one don't respond well to extortion threats, so write your damned
>>article.

	I agree; PH-B is commiting a bunch of fallacies here and tarring
all cypherpunks with the same brush as Jim Bell just because they haven't
repudiated Assasination Politics is just being obnoxious.

>I personally don't have the time or energy to contribute to the AP threads.
>That != approval for the idea.

	Ditto; I could spend time analysing AP, but life's too short to waste
it on refuting everything I disagree with in detail.

	Derek "who is _not_ Jim" Bell

References:
- Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
  - From: Rich Burroughs <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Possible snake oil?
Next by Date: Re: AP
Prev by thread: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
Next by thread: Re: Hallam-Baker demands more repudiations or he'll write!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread