[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clipper III on the table
At 06:31 PM 10/1/96 -0700, Lucky Green wrote:
>
>
>
>On Tue, 1 Oct 1996, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>[as to why HP and others support GAK in exchange for DES export]
>
>> I agree with Lucky's earlier hypothesis that HP's doing this to curry
>favor
>> for government contracts in lieu of an actual marketing strategy, and I
>> leave TIS's motives up to the list as an exercise. ;-).
>
>This not a hypothesis. A policy person from HP told me that
>
>1. HP as well as TIS and other companies sell single DES products that
>they would like to be able to export.
>2. He was directed by HP's marketing department to find a way to make
>that happen.
>3. He therefore supports a GAK for export "compromise".
HP, then, might be a good company to approach as a potential donor on a
DES-cracker. While they want to be able to portray their products as
reasonably secure, at the same time they want to be able to de-fuse any
export limits. Showing that, say, $25,000 of hardware could crack DES in a
year (and thus, presumably, $25 million could crack DES in 1/3 of a day, a
budget available to the NSA et al.) would demonstrate that there's no strong
reason to keep it restricted in any way.
Jim Bell
[email protected]