[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not PGP?
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996 [email protected] wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Does anyone think that legislation might be passed which would
> criminalize my communications with Ray?
Yes. But I don't think the courts would uphold it in the face of a
well-presented constitutional challenge. See
http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/clipper.htm
>
> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code in
> it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given a
> copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
> whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.
> Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?
Yes, but these are currently being challenged in 3 separate court actions.
The administration asserts, however, that "hooks" are every bit as
unexportable as the real thing.
A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law |
U. Miami School of Law | [email protected]
P.O. Box 248087 | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.