[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Forward Privacy" for ISPs and Customers
Thanks for the pointer; I'll check it out... Guess I should have been
looking here on eff.org rather than elsewhere. EPIC has some good stuff
too at http://www.epic.org/privacy/wiretap/
-Declan
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Mark M. wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>
> > A month or two ago, I searched through the existing DT statute and posted
> > language that could be interpreted as applying to ISPs. If there's an ISP
> > exemption I missed, please post...
>
> I originally read that ISP's were exempt from a Wired article in the February
> '96 issue. I did some searching on EFF's web site and found the text of the
> 1994 draft of DT. The bill says that information services and private networks
> are exempt from the requirements of subsection (a). I have no idea what
> subsection a is, but a seperate analysis by the EFF does say that the bill
> does not apply to Internet Service Providers. Maybe there is some section
> of the bill that does cover ISP's, but I don't think it is anything relating
> to facilitating wiretapping.
>
> I found this information at
> http://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy/Digital_Telephony_FBI.
>
> Mark
> - --
> finger -l for PGP key
> PGP encrypted mail prefered.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3
> Charset: noconv
>
> iQEVAwUBMl1aaizIPc7jvyFpAQFQdAgAoiWWFAEAnZY8Wa/b/LjbTGjxpG4C3IIJ
> n2R7vyE7Xu3w6xLYE8bwv27zuULgo0frw9Cw45fOehelT5x/e8wazNDjJ/zddBUu
> aE+6Nm1s6bAYVr+eIIaDT+uWz4S/H3HT2QNCmypXC0suecXtKqpSa0Ug4HsxQCYV
> yHOovHZAmIAMbKHvoZ8FlnXG4YCYD9yoIVL4HMuBW4pNqCfNs1VqzegfoBiOs4E/
> AOwTuSSC0W0frh6joDyt0Oymi8dd1rPvI2U5gYQxntKc8sd31XPJoL4Qr/e091q1
> 1mVOxJbrVH2DHRNR/WE8+iiU2tBCss4H9bk1kVsodnRogyPjUDfyuQ==
> =RX8E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
// [email protected] // I do not represent the EFF // [email protected] //