[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not PGP?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Ray wrote:
>Rollo Silver wrote:
[snip]
>> 2. Suppose someone writes a program Z that has no expicit crypto code in
>> it, but has hooks for installing one or another version of PGP. Given a
>> copy of Z, someone in this country could install PGP he got from MIT,
>> whereas someone in Europe could install the international version.
>> Would export of Z violate ITAR restrictions?
>
>Yes.
>JMR
Does this mean that exporting Private Idaho, PGPfront, WinPGP, etc. would
be a violation of ITAR because they function only when combined with PGP
and contain "hooks" for using PGP?
I don't recall any restrictions on who could download these files from
their host sites.
Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQB1AwUBMl6ZSN36bir1/qfZAQGUWAMAmbh59CK2wMBt/AVCEcwoiknVgIYMNRmS
B2s4YJyvq5QQnUkynUcMSU17vltRhwQyapz22lg4rZZxYIoEC0P3vVDkH3mPCnnE
qPSMtwtV+o1//cOQHjD7VfjeScO69R7u
=Np5A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Heaney finger [email protected] for public key
PGP Fingerprint= BB D8 9B 07 51 87 05 AC 47 7B F2 4F A6 AB 1A CD
-----------------------------------------------------------------
You keep using that word, I dunna think it means what you think it means.