Re: rival Clipper products

["Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 16 Oct 1996, Psuedo Nym wrote:

> What somebody needs to do is make a rival for
> Clipper products. I propose that somebody with
> enough money should have a Clipper-type chip
> implementing Triple-DES or whatever developed
> and marketed. They should do the same things,
> except not be restricted by the government
> (obviously this wouldn't be for export) by the means
> of using weak crypto. These devices could probably
> be marketed to the same audience that Clipper
> products are aimed at, i.e. the general unsuspecting
> populace. The only problem I could see would be
> educating whoever buys into how the government
> is pulling the wool over their eyes. I'm sure with
> some funding from a major source, or some
> donation of time/supplies from a manufacturing
> company, it could be pulled off in grand fashion.
> Who said we can't play the government's little game?

Clipper is dead.  It makes no sense for anyone to pay >$70 for a hardware
encryption device when many tools are available on the 'net for free.  AT&T
is manufacturing a clipper phone and there aren't any software products that I
know of that support Fortezza(?) cards.  The much larger danger is the recent
"key recovery" initiative.

Mark
- -- 
finger -l for PGP key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBMmaPHyzIPc7jvyFpAQFJugf/c5fLnzoXkfZl5ChWZDRlJwMrozj9GBii
e8tzkS+lp8dnlUoN78mE+gcxZ4+NYBsYKHvYN51wZ8K69Fkh9KrVKcgv06rXBHmk
cTwvA0QwoJh051V/jo6BONqHdBEyK76kOyIzU9R0Z3GRlkk08wbXm1oYu3NOWUdR
sHvwZjAg23oI07DlPIOUuvadCLiOrCV4gjgzxeUCmK04G0ey+/JeCC3mQA5s/KQA
Uy8k7VNCXgLOMe7ZPLgoNnqOIMb3rEODKtvcIqmp+AX8Dfi7llayG5q+2bwlmSdF
MkgroQV1ce0ernBvpCoki0+3pVvGyWagNiIby42oW2VmQL458z+TRA==
=a7G1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----