[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OTP

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OTP
From: Paul Bradley <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 16:48:36 +0000
CC: [email protected]
Comments: Authenticated sender is <[email protected]>
Priority: normal
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

> 
> Ooops : there is no possible attack at all with a properly
> implmented OTP cryptosystem.  There is no keyspace to "brute-force"
> search.  Any message is as likely as any other.  Check Schneier.

Yeah, someone else pointed this out to me, it was just a slip of the 
keyboard, I think I started of talking about an OTP and slipped into 
stream cipher mode... 


  Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
       Paul Bradley, [email protected]
  [email protected], [email protected]    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

Follow-Ups:
- Q.E.D P+P == talk the talk - but - P+P != walk the walk
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: Netescrow & Remailers?
Next by Date: Re: [SERDAR ARGIC] Ray Arachelian's role in massacare of 2,
Prev by thread: Re: OTP
Next by thread: Q.E.D P+P == talk the talk - but - P+P != walk the walk
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread