[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Censorship on cypherpunks
At 06:54 PM 11/3/96 -0500, you wrote:
> Except it's not very effective, is it, since he's still
>posting flames? In any case, it's an admission on John
>Gilmore's part that libertarianism can't work without some
>measure of authoritarianism; the only argument is over _just how
>much_ authoritarianism we need.
>
> I'm quite upset about this. Up to now I was able to tell
>people that "there is at least one mailing list on the net that
>functions in a completely open manner". No more.
>
>
>Will French <[email protected]>
What has it got to do with libertarianism? John Gilmore is not the
government, he just runs the list. If we don't like what he does, we can
start a new list. I'm not sure that it was a good idea to remove Vulis, but
I don't believe that this single act reflects on any theory of governance.
>
>
[email protected], [email protected],
http://users.aol.com/salaned/cyberplace.html
"Life, he himself said once, (his biografiend, in fact, kills him verysoon,
if yet not, after) is a wake, livit or krikit, and on the bunk of our
breadwinning, lies the cropse of our seedfather..."