[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Information
P. J. Ponder wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 1996, Edward R. Figueroa wrote:
> > I'm a new Cyberpunk!
> > Last, I would like to know once and for all, is PGP compromised, is
> > there a back door, and have we been fooled by NSA to believe it's secure?
> As far as anyone knows that has publicly commented on it, PGP is presumed
> to be secure against known attacks. By making the source code available,
> and basing the encryption on published methods - RSA and IDEA, PGP has
> been reviewed extensively by the world's experts on crypto, and those
> experts that publish their results have said there is no known easy way
> to crack it. There are, of course, many experts who do not publish their
> results - for instance, cryptographers who work for intelligence
> gathering agencies. What they have found out about RSA and IDEA the rest
> of us don't know. There are efforts underway to prove mathematically how
> hard it is to break the sort of encryption that PGP is based on.
[snippo]
Just to make it easy for you: PGP will keep out your snoopy neighbors on the net, but
if you're betting it will lock out the government, you're probably peeing up the
proverbial rope.