[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Black Unicorn exposed?

To: [email protected] (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Black Unicorn exposed?
From: "David Lesher / hated by RBOC's in 5 states" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 16:16:09 -0500 (EST)
Cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v02140b03aeaa71ed1c84@[192.0.2.1]> from "Peter Hendrickson" at Nov 9, 96 09:45:05 am
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

Peter Hendrickson sez:
> 
> At 11:00 AM 11/9/1996, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> > S. L. vonBernhardt, <mailto:[email protected]>,...
> 
> Black Unicorn recently stated that had taken measures to shield
> his identity so that people would be unable to cause harm to
> his professional activities by making unsubstantiated claims
> that could scare off prospective clients.
> 
> It appears now that this protection has evaporated.  

How do you know he does not have a THIRD name........?

-- 
A host is a host from coast to [email protected]
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Black Unicorn exposed?
  - From: [email protected] (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

References:
- Black Unicorn exposed?
  - From: [email protected] (Peter Hendrickson)

Prev by Date: Re: New Linux-IPSEC mailing list for the S/WAN project
Next by Date: RRE: notes (8 Nov 1996)
Prev by thread: Re: Black Unicorn exposed?
Next by thread: Re: Black Unicorn exposed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread