Re: a retort + a comment + a question = [RANT]

[Dave Kinchlea <security@kinch.ark.com>]

On Sun, 10 Nov 1996 SUCRUM22_at_INDY-ADP@smtp-gw.cv62.navy.mil wrote:

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> dave kinchlea wrote:
> >As said in "Hair" (the movie), "Don't do it for me man, 'cause 
> >if the shoe was on the other foot, I wouldn't do it for you!" 
> 
> >It's a lie anyway, you do it for yourself.
> 
> That's an _easy_ judgment to make (and i definitely have to stop 
> adding anecdotes from my life in these things!), but you missed the 
> point - the freedoms the Cpunks diligently try to preserve (or seem to 

I missed nothing, I simply don't agree. It seems to me that the US
military is much more the agressor than the defender. Just who is it that
you are believe you are defending against? What year do you live in?

> want to create...) are protected _by_ the military.  who was it that 
> said:       "law, without force, is impotent"  -?  

The military is NOT the defender of laws, that is the job for the civilian
police. Are you really that confused? I actually live in Canada where I
enjoy the same or more freedoms that you do, funny thing though, we don't
find it necessary to have a large military force to `protect' us. 

[...]

> 
> was i assuming that you've read the book and/or seen the broadway 
> play, "Hair"?  OHHHHH - i'm sorry - you saw the _movie!_ shame on me.

What the fuck is this? When did the play end on broadway, mid-seventies?
Do you have a point? I thought not. The only reason I pointed out that it
was the movie is because I am not certain that that line IS in the play.
You see I practice something called honesty, something you might do well
to learn about yourself.