Re: ideal secure personal computer system

[Joel McNamara <joelm@eskimo.com>]

See the CryptoBook link at http://www.eskimo.com/~joelm

While the concepts were originally developed for a laptop, they're easily
applied to a desktop machine running Win95.

Joel

>Here's a question: if one were designing for oneself a secure personal
>computer system, for use in, say, word processing, spreadsheet,
>communications, the usuals - what system would one purchase and how would
>one set it up?
>
>For example, on the Mac I would envision this as the ideal system:
>
>(1) Get a power mac
>(2) Partition the hard drive into two partitions:
>    install the system folder on one and a copy of CryptDisk
>    make this the startup partition and make it READ ONLY with aliases to
>    folders you want to be modiyfable (such as Eudora Folder in the sys
folder)
>    place these folders on the encrypted partition
>(3) Completely fill the other partition with a CryptDisk file so there is no
>    room for other stuff to be written. Adjust the partition size if needed.
>(4) Install a screen saver (such as shareware Eclipse) that will password
lock
>    the screen after a few minutes of inactivity, and set CryptDisk to
dismount
>    the external partition after a few minutes of inactivity (or longer)
>
>This would be a basic setup. If one had more complex ideas, such as setting
>it up so casual onlookers would not notice the system was protected, you
>could do things like have a decoy normal partition with system folder to
>boot from by default, to be bypassed with an external locked system folder
>disk, after which one could dismount the decoy partition and mount the
>encrypted partition.
>
>If locking the startup volume turns out to be too much of a pain, one could
>install trashguard from Highware software and set it to triple overwrite
>deleted files, and otherwise not lock the startup partition.
>
>How would things work on Windows 95? I imagine most of the old DOS-based
>encryption utilities may have compatibility problems with W95. What would a
>similar ideal system be for a PC?
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>