Re: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News

[aga <aga@dhp.com>]

On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Mark M. wrote:
> 
> The EFF protects against government censorship, not against "editorial
> control", "censorship", or whatever else you want to call it.  I don't
> see this as hypocritical at all.
> 

The EFF does not protect shit, and it is just a tangent takeoff
from the Greatfull Dead drugheads.  We would also be greatfull if the
EFF was dead, too.  

> > Mr. Gilmore, and other like minded parties, might want to consider
> > what would happen if one parent company owned *all* communications
> > media. Would they they be so supportive of the ideology of ownership
> > and communciation they espouse?
> 
> And just how plausible do you think this is?  I believe it is next to
> impossible, unless it is the result of government regulation.
> 

Yeah, and those EFF facists think they can be the government?

> Mark
> - -- 
> finger -l for PGP key
> PGP encrypted mail prefered.
> 

Why?  Are you a criminal?
What are you hiding behind your PGP?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.3
> Charset: noconv
> 
> iQEVAwUBMopa3SzIPc7jvyFpAQFzIggAr9nx5gd8J35wq5+UUUC9lHJD9hX7wcM+
> DNRaZqRUlB/Dq4Xc0rbP7O4zSIob0QVbbQlZXylQcNwdCcb0wzMD2hkw8Xg31mHQ
> s8jZwONGM8ljmg8aDSB1WuTsVnmrbcXGM/Jhmc+TPLjQxFQldONl6SGXIAQ58Vt8
> DgunHoAZuR6AYWd64ssIFHSVzCR6bk4kL/QJ/0kGSr2x4FHJf62GhOrG/NguF3dd
> 85dXgUmoI2/f2B6SkfwbHPgZZhOGPgDt2rIPLo3S2JlhTYANSLhtA2souXQAz1bX
> lfnEbxt4JNmy4zwT6m244VuuNtpFbF1OL1YAaZaU/WmUXTxeIohQYw==
> =FbgX
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>