[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal

To: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
From: Lucky Green <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:13:47 -0800 (PST)
cc: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v03007813aeb0506ae6a3@[206.119.69.46]>
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Robert Hettinga wrote:

> At 10:43 pm -0500 11/13/96, Lucky Green wrote:
> >I agree. Support for soon to be patent free algrithms is a good thing. I
> >hope that in version 4.0, after the users had time to migrate to
> >DSS/ElGamal, PGP will fully move away from RSA.
> 
> Speaking of patent-free, :-), can you do blind signatures without RSA?

Yes, but you still need to license the blind signature patent itself.

--Lucky

References:
- Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
  - From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: ??????????????????????
Next by Date: Re: take me off your mailing list
Prev by thread: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
Next by thread: Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread