[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The TRILATERAL COMMISSION -was: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on...
At 12:34 �� 14/11/1996 -0500, Mark M. wrote:
(in response to me saying):
>> Man you're nutts. There are very few and quite vast Media Companies
>> in the world, and they're on the verge of becoming monopolies.
>>
>> Even your American President is in reality a puppet of the Trilateral
>> Commission, who effectively also control CNN, the Washington Post,
>> and many many many other things all over the world.
>>
>> And you are saying that control of the media by ownership is
>> impossible? You're far out maaan! :-)
>>
>> Only in America such a naive opinion could actually be _believed_.
>> (here I go again... aga! :-) )
>
>Is this a troll?
Nope; It's the truth. Expressed like a sarcastic joke as well, but
it's _true_. And not intended to be a troll at all.
As regards the "gullibility", it's plainly dangerous; And cultivated
by the Media, apparently stronger in the U.S. than in many other places.
But: How many times do I have to state explicitly that my grumbles about
America are not "anti-American" (troll) propaganda? Nope; They're grumbles
about _freedoms_, that if you Americans lose, the rest of the world will
_also_ lose, (even quicker, I think)... Here is a REAL example:
(written by E. Francis, on the "Trilateral Commission", and distributed
to all members of his own -private- mailing list, of which I'm a part).
>THE LAND OF SHADOWS
>
> Early this month is the last presidential
>"election" before the year 2000. As of this writing and
>long before, the election was decided in favor of Bill
>Clinton. It works out astrologically, but the real
>reason is because Clinton's bosses control the
>corporations that control the nation, and they also
>happen to own the major media which, shall we say, help
>the public make up its mind about who to vote for --
>media like CNN, NBC, The Washington Post, The New York
>Times, Tribune Co., Time-Warner and others.
> This is not speculation, and if you would allow me
>to pre-empt this astrological column with a brief
>expos�, I will explain. All of these news organizations
>are members of an international institution called the
>Trilateral Commission (which is listed in the Manhattan
>phone book, by the way). Bill Clinton and more than 20
>of his cabinet ministers are also on the list. Bob Dole
>isn't a member, and neither is Jack Kemp, so in a very
>real sense, they are the outsider candidates.
> Since the organization's creation in 1973, every
>White House has had Trilateral Commission
>representation, starting with former Vice President
>Nelson D. Rockefeller, the brother of the Commission's
>co-founder, David Rockefeller. In 1976, Jimmy Carter, a
>member of the Commission and close associate of the
>Rockefellers, was "elected" president, and so on down
>the line in an unbroken chain through Bill Clinton. In
>one presidential election in the 1980s, all three
>candidates were Trilateralists! And in the election
>right before the current one, it was Trilateralist
>George Bush versus Trilateralist Bill Clinton. It's a
>little like both candidates in the old Soviet elections
>coming from the Communist party.
> You may wonder, "What's the big deal?" But look at
>it this way. What if every president or vice president
>for the past 22 years had been an executive of Grumman
>Aerospace or a graduate of Harvard University? You
>might suspect that Grumman or Harvard had a little
>extra influence and was getting its people into
>positions of power. But since the nation's most
>powerful media are also represented on the Commission,
>its existence rarely gets reported, and its true nature
>is never accurately reported except in the alternative
>media. Check the National Newspaper Index in any
>library and you'll find, at most, one or two references
>to the Commission, and both seek to belittle its
>importance.
> And people who are involved in the organization
>don't like to talk about it. I recently caught up with
>Secretary of the Interior (and Trilateral Commission
>member) Bruce Babbit while he was on a speaking
>engagement at the posh Mohonk Mountain House in my
>area. A number of newspaper reporters were gathered
>around him asking him the usual trivia. When I asked
>him directly about his involvement on the commission,
>and the president's, and that of some two dozen other
>cabinet members, with the red light of a video camera
>coming from behind me, Bruce cracked a joke about how I
>would be a popular guy "out west" (ostensibly where
>everybody has weird political theories), then he turned
>tail and ran away from the news conference.
> Commission membership also includes key federal
>legislators, people on the incredibly powerful Federal
>Reserve Board, major bankers and the CEOs of numerous
>corporations of the General Electric and General Foods
>ilk. And it's an international institution as well,
>_majority-dominated by business and political interests
>in other lands, particularly Germany and Japan_.
>Consider the implications. It is arguable that the
>Trilateral White House is dominated by government and
>business interests of foreign nations, which is
>clearly, blatantly unconstitutional.
> The above-mentioned national media directly
>involved with this organization, which set the national
>news agenda here in the U.S. and for much of the
>western world, are the same ones which are manipulating
>the current election by sanitizing all the news that
>should be coming out of Washington and elsewhere, by
>not tallying the impressive pile of corpses collecting
>around the President, and most of all, by bombarding us
>with PR-generated trivia and commercials 24 hours a day
>when there are somewhat more significant things to
>concern ourselves with.
> And of course, the economy keeps getting better.
> But just in case you ever wondered just how it
>happened that some unknown governor of Arkansas ended
>up tooling around the globe aboard Air Force One, now
>you have a clue. And in case you thought people were
>stupid, well, this makes a good case for people just
>being manipulated. But of course, you'd have no way of
>knowing this if the only place you got your information
>was a television set or newspaper. Perhaps this is why
>big government is so interested in censoring the
>Internet.
> I don't believe that the Trilateral Commission is
>a conspiracy, I believe it's just one fact of how the
>ruling class of the Western world organizes itself.
> There are other levels of aristocratic shadow-
>government organization, and they're quite worth while
>to study, but this one sure points to some interesting
>possibilities, and boy, the fact that you never hear it
>mentioned should make really you wonder.
> Not that there isn't enough to wonder about
>already, and not that any of it matters.
> After all, nothing really happens nowadays. Flight
>800 got shot down, but nobody did it. It just sort of
>exploded and fell out of the sky. Not only wasn't there
>a perpetrator, there wasn't even a cause determined for
>the explosion!
> We have wars�-- safe ones, where nobody comes back
>with their arms and legs blown off. The federal budget
>deficit increased by a few billion dollars in the time
>it took me to write this article, and yet it's
>meaningless. There is no public mention of the
>Constitutional amendment, the famous 14th Amendment,
>which explicitly states, "The validity of the public
>debt of the United States...shall not be questioned."
>It's the law of the land!
> So, lest I blow a few too many of my brain cells
>thinking about this, I will now go back to being an
>astrologer.
> End of expos�
>