Re: KILL cypherpunks !!!

[Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>]

On Mon, 25 Nov 1996, aga wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> dude, you put the cypherpunks list in the header again.
> You really want that list killed, do you not?


Yes, please kill us.

> > > Look dude, a Juris Doctor IS a Doctorate of Law.
> > 
> > Incorrect.
> > 
> 
> Look asshole; it says "LAW DOCTOR" -- that is what "Juris Doctor"
> means, stupid.  And I am about to stick the motherfucking Laws
> right up your cocksucking ASS!

Well, unfortunately the force of your will can't change fact.  Nor can the
use of profanity or caps.

> > One can obtain a Doctorate in Law, (As in Dr.) but it is generally a
> > pointless endeavor except in some civil law jurisdictions.  (Liechtenstein
> > is a good example, where many attornies have a Dr.Iur. (Dr.) while others
> > merely have a Lic.Iur. (J.D.) ).
> > 
> > A J.D. requires no dissertation.
> > A Doctorate in Law does.
> > 
> 
> Wrong.  A J.D. requires a 75 page moot-court dissertation which
> is always new legal research.

Funny, I got mine without preforming such research.
I think you better write to Harvard and Georgetown and tell them they are
in trouble.  Their requirements are nothing like this.

> > A J.D. is not a true Doctorate, and even if it were, it would not be the
> > only current valid "Doctorate" that you can "do" in "plain Law."
> > 
> 
> "Juris" means Law.  So Juris Doctor means "Law Doctor."

Ah, QED then, right?

And the Pawnee tribe must be from india cause they are called "Indians."

> > Georgetown, as an example, offers a Doctorate in Law degree which requires
> > a J.D., an LL.M. and three years of legal teaching experience simply to
> > qualify for the program.
> > 
> 
> that is irrelevant, and you are off-topic.

You claim that a J.D. and Doctorate in Law are the same degree.  I show
you a specific example which indicates otherwise, and it is irrelevant,
and off topic?

> > A Doctor of Judicial Science program is also available with many of the
> > same requirements.
> > 
> > Both programs require a dissertation and a defense of same.
> > 
> > San Marcos University is also known for an exceptional Doctor of Laws
> > program.
> > 
> > Incidently, LL.D.s are rare and generally useful only in European circles.
> > 
> 
> Europe is also irrelevant, and you keep missing the point here.
> You have added the cypherpunks list again, and that was forbidden.

Oh, I've been a baaad boy.
 
> > As usual, you have overextended your bounds and now find yourself swimming
> > in water over your head.
> > 
> 
> look asshole, you really want that list killed, do you not?
> I have no bounds, as you will soon learn.

I'm cowering from the big powerful hacker with a Doctorate in Law and such
scary words.

> > > > > Go and eat your swiss cheese, as that is apparently all you
> > > > > are good for.  My mercenaries are too busy to go to europe
> > > > > right now.
> > > > 
> > > > I prefer Chedder.
> > > > 
> > > > Be careful who you threaten.  It might get you in trouble.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Threatening to wipe out your location on the InterNet is
> > > not against ANY law whatsoever, and I can mailbomb you, do
> > > a DOS attack, fork-bomb attack and virus attack against you,
> > > all of which are perfectly legal.
> > 
> > Actually, they are not.  Unauthorized access of a computer system is a
> > crime.  Anyone who had a "doctorate" in law would know this.
> > 
> 
> WRONG!  There is NO crime which covers anything that one does
> internationally!   And mailbombing is NOT "Unauthorized access,"
> regardless of where it occurs!

Study up on situs of a criminal act and jurisdiction please.

> 
> > I doubt your reference to mercenaries was merely a threat to my system,
> > but keep pushing if you like.
> > 
> > > > > Look asshole, I graduated from Law School with a Doctorate
> > > > > in 1975.  Now just go away and stop interfering with our
> > > > > American Net.
> > 
> > Which law school?  And did you do a dissertation?  What is its title?  Do
> > you practice?  What state are you licensed in?
> > 
> 
> Pitt-1975; Dissertation was in 1983 actions.  I practiced for
> six years, and then became perfect.

Which is why the Pennsylvania bar decided you had to be disbared.  I see.

> I currently do not practice for
> any parties other than myself, family, corporation or Institutes,
> and I need no license for that.

Good thing too or you'd be fined for practicing without a license.

> And since I do not carry any
> license from any State, there is NOTHING that you can do to stop me.
> The State disciplinary board has no jurisdiction, nor does any
> Law.

You seem quite familiar with the disciplinary boards proceedures.  I think
a query for their records might be interesting.  Perhaps it would make an
entertaining post.


> A Criminal Lawyer is a specialist in ripping new assholes
> on the witness stand.

Clearly you were never a criminal lawyer.

> This is a world-wide internet problem that you are about to get
> taken care of.  You will be among the first locations to be
> eliminated.  And just remember that your termination is your own
> doing.  You had your chance to keep the fucking cypherpunks list
> OFF of your e-mail to me, and blew it.

Oops, now what will I ever do?

> I pump iron and run three times a week.  And as a Tae Kwon Do
> black belt holder, I get lots of physical activity. I am in
> better physical shape than any other man that you know.

I have a date this weekend already, thanks.

--
Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland