[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks maiing list
[email protected] (Igor Chudov @ home) writes:
> I would like to start a thread to discuss the moderation and rejection
> policy.
I predict that Sandy won't allow any posts on the censored list that
question his moderation poilicy - only the unanymous praises.
> My perfectly crypto-relevant article regarding possible attacks
> on human relationships with the use of forged mail and anonymous
> remailers, has been tossed out (sorted) into cypherpunks-flames
> mailing list.
A dishonorable act.
> You can receive a copy of my article by an email request.
Perhaps you want to start putting up rejected articles on a Web page?
> The explanation that Sandy Sandfort gave me mentioned that he rejected
> my message because it continued a thread where Sandy noticed instances
> of "flaming". Note that my message was free of any flames, including
> its quoted part.
That's correct.
> Sandy also states rather plainly that crypto-relevance is not the
> criterion by which he moderates this list. I question this policy.
Sandy's personal likes and dislikes of certain posters are the criterion.
> I would like to hear your opinions as to whether such policies satisfy
> the current readership.
You won't be allowed to on this censored mailing list.
---
<a href="mailto:[email protected]">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps