Re: Rejection policy of the Cypherpunks mailing list

[paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk]

> > The exercise reveals to me that only by ignoring the first paragraph
> > of your example, the part that reads "Imagine if you will a list, 
> > the original purpose of which was to act as a free and open forum 
> > for discussion of cryptography and related issues." can you make
> > a claim of content based censorship. The purpose of this list was

Maybe this was misleading, that was indeed a purpose of the list but 
it was also supposed to be a free and anarchic list where people were 
not prevented from posting whatever they want.

Even if it were the case that we accepted content based censorship 
that is no defence of the obvious class system that is in place 
whereby certain posters are automatically sent straight to the 
moderated list and others are censored regardless of the content of 
their posts.

 

  Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security
       Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
  Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org    
       Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
      Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1
     "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"