[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme

To: [email protected] (Peter Hendrickson)
Subject: Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
From: [email protected] (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 02:10:30 CST
>Received: by scytale.com (1.65/waf)via UUCP; Sat, 04 Jan 97 02:55:23 CSTfor [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
In-Reply-To: <v02140b00aef397cb9933@[192.0.2.1]>
Organization: Not that I've noticed
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, [email protected] writes:

> In essence, the poster is betting that the moderator will approve
> the post retroactively.

> The "moderator" returns the money to people when posts are worthwhile
> and keeps it otherwise.

> Of course, there's no reason to have just one moderator on the list.

In the case of several moderators, who gets the ecash?  And doesn't this
open the list to bidding?  "Pass this message, and you can keep the
e$500."
- -- 
           Roy M. Silvernail     [ ]     [email protected]
DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division
PGP Public Key fingerprint =  31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54  13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
      Key available from [email protected], which works now

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMs4Q8hvikii9febJAQEbrAQAmgwAeqSsi2qIkqakNRPCpwCwNnYudNRi
SuPE2LueC+WuhugtLeyDDet+WgefE9X84F4qxn/QVB+tJAGbZzfCPO24shelXEyz
ngr0oevKqzcfAAzbB4tMtXe5gl6+zykExXjsx4J/KjMNPL0QAE490uvnKqus/aE8
mSlAU9k/KQo=
=ik7B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Modified Token Posting Scheme
  - From: [email protected] (Peter Hendrickson)

Prev by Date: Personal use exception to ITAR/EAR
Next by Date: Re: Naive Export Question
Prev by thread: Modified Token Posting Scheme
Next by thread: Re: Modified Token Posting Scheme
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread