[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ONE MILLION CHILDREN..... (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In list.cypherpunks, [email protected] writes:
> Forwarded message:
>
>> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 10:24:21 -0800
>> From: Dale Thorn <[email protected]>
>>
>> C'mon Gary, why would anyone want to bother with all of this crap?
>> Chip implants are already in millions of pets. It's simple, cheap,
>> and there's no work for the owner.
>
> And there are several standards which are NOT compatible. Simply putting a
> chip in your pet (or child) is not sufficient to guarantee their return.
I would really like to see some statistics on the number of "lost
children" who have suffered (any given incommodation) exclusively due to
their inability to be positively linked with some True Idendity. Most
of the English-speaking children with which I'm aquainted can answer the
question "What's your name?".
- --
Roy M. Silvernail [ ] [email protected]
DNRC Minister Plenipotentiary of All Things Confusing, Software Division
PGP Public Key fingerprint = 31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54 13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
Key available from [email protected], which works now
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMs9ZERvikii9febJAQFdSwP/Tvwvd/cKyU3AIZGnxzawB7TvtZzxix0n
lfORbWDAdt6NEPSST6QJKNFhfmedk34OdaeppwXiQd3S/mqFksXzctDr3oPRlgOz
uHxaHow9sGPJsraqIbXehGtbg1xBnMYrVLjEx2wnRB2yeTWr8jAWfqDrza+yGtKc
CNU0n3z4zig=
=3ElR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----